Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these types of systems. Right from lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the border to a system for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being utilised in asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their very own capacity to steer these devices and to follow their legal right for safeguard.

It also illustrates how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from being able to view the stations of safeguards. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of those technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects so, who are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: even though they assist with expedite the asylum method, they also produce it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental celebrities, and www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.